Corporate

Govt to contest EU's probe on steel fasteners

The government would contest the claims of European steel product makers that it is subsiding domestic manufacturers and has asked the engineering industry to collect data that would help in defending Indian firms. - No HIV screening of job seekers, employees: Govt policy - Govt initiates anti-dumping probe against acetone imports - Maharashtra set to get new govt tomorrow - Steel bar traders want separate market in Bhopal - Maharatna status for top PSUs likely in a month - RBS to get virtually nationalised; govt to hike stake to 84% The European Union (EU) had initiated the anti-subsidy proceedings in August against Indian exports of certain type of stainless steel fastners like screw, nuts and bolts on a complaint by its steel fasteners industry and has asked India to file a reply, an official said. The government has asked the EEPC, the apex body of engineering goods exporters, to collect all the data that would help in contesting the EU"s proceedings against Indian firms. "The EU has initiated an anti-subsidy proceeding against export of certain stainless steel fasteners and parts (manufactured by cold forged process or without heating) originating from India," the official said. India"s exports of steel fastners to the EU was estimated at $149 million during April-December 2008-09. Anti-subsidy means a subsidy as a financial contribution made by a government which confers a benefit to the producer or exporter. The countervailing duties would neutralise the benefit of such a subsidy.


Add your comment:
Name:
Site address: http://
Your message:
Enter today\\\\'s date, 2 digits
(spam protection):

News of the day
Concrete investments
The worth of a company in the infrastructure sector needs careful evaluation.
Popular Articles

What Gladwell saw, and questioned
At the height of the dot-com boom of the 1990s, several executives at McKinsey & Company, the world’s most prestigious management consulting firm, launched what they called the War for Talent. After extensive research, they concluded that the best companies had leaders who were obsessed with “the talent issue”. They recruited ceaselessly, finding and hiring as many top performers as possible. They singled out and segregated their stars, rewarding them disproportionately, and pushing them into ever more senior positions. The “talent mind-set” became the new orthodoxy of American management — the intellectual justification for why a high premium was placed on degrees from first-tier business schools, and why the compensation packages for top executives had become so lavish.

Low-cost deposits are back
Banks see funds flowing into current, savings accounts.